Some thoughts on pre-prohibition pilsner and other beers
Pre-prohibition pilsner suffers the same fate as virtually all beers from that era. They are all treated as mild curiosities despite amounting to, in some cases, hundreds of years of North American brewing history. Meanwhile, brewers plumb the depths of European beer history looking for obscure styles and more ways to incorporate hype-earning nostalgia into beer marketing.
It's actually easy to see why American pre-prohibition beer styles get so little love. Their history is dominated by the same industrial light lager brewers that squeeze craft beer out of the markets. They are also often considered "not real" versions of their German or English counterparts. Shiner Bock, for example, arises from early post-prohibition attempts to return to brewing pre-prohibition styles. Sure, it is not a good version of a German bock but it is a pretty good example of an American bock of the type worked out by eighteenth century brewers trying to emulate the German style. (And if you feel Americanized versions of these beers are inauthentic then you should feel the same about German pilsner as an inauthentic version of Czech pilsner.)
Additionally, the basis for many of these recipes arises from a need to work around available ingredients which is rarely a problem in today's brewing. Corn appears in many pre-prohibition recipes because it was available and helped cut the domestic barley supply, which often included protein-heavy six row, to create lighter beers. Some of the older recipes, particularly English derived recipes, contain all sorts of bizarre substitute ingredients. These types recipes aren't sexy and can be more of a pain to brew. Adding a cereal mash for adjuncts takes time that a straight malt-based pilsner doesn't need.
Nevertheless, we should not be so cavalier about throwing away this part of our brewing history. These beers were built out of the same ingenuity to make the best beer out of the available ingredients and equipment that led to the historical European beers that brewers crave emulating. Why can't a homebrewer or small craft brewery consider corn and other pre-prohibition ingredients? Not all of us have fallen spruce trees or chanterelle mushrooms in our backyard.
Designing this pre-prohibition pilsner inspired recipe
Having failed in my research I turned to taking a more liberal approach to designing my pilsner recipe. As usual I did not constrain myself to trying to brew a perfectly historical pilsner. Rather, I let historical sources guide my path with a fair amount of veering--hence calling it an inspired recipe and not a historical recipe.
While many pre-prohibition pilsner recipes split their grain bill between six row pale malt and corn I opted for two row pale simply because it's what I had on hand. For corn I discovered my parents tried growing corn around the same time I started researching this project. They let me have quite a bit of their meager harvest which I froze to eventually make this beer. It's sweet corn rather than the starchier corn generally used in brewing. Because this corn is much softer than starchier varieties I opted not to mill it before the cereal mash. Instead I boiled it and then mashed it by hand with a meat tenderizer. I would use something less manual for a larger batch but on this one gallon homebrew recipe it wasn't much work.
Homebrew recipes for this style often insist Cluster is the only appropriate hop for the style. Authors advancing this position often rely on the contention that Cluster was the dominant native hop grown before prohibition therefore it must have been used in the style. While I am confident there were many pilsners using Cluster in whole or in part I find it difficult to believe all American brewers relied exclusively on this hop. Hops were imported from Europe and there undoubtedly was some planting of German and English hops on this side of the pond. I chose a hop somewhere in the middle of American fruitiness and German grassy/floral by selecting Mt. Hood. It's not like Cluster much at all but I don't like Cluster.
Added the hand-mashed corn to the mash tun--the liquid from the cereal mash went into the rest of the hot liquor |
Homebrew recipes for this style often insist Cluster is the only appropriate hop for the style. Authors advancing this position often rely on the contention that Cluster was the dominant native hop grown before prohibition therefore it must have been used in the style. While I am confident there were many pilsners using Cluster in whole or in part I find it difficult to believe all American brewers relied exclusively on this hop. Hops were imported from Europe and there undoubtedly was some planting of German and English hops on this side of the pond. I chose a hop somewhere in the middle of American fruitiness and German grassy/floral by selecting Mt. Hood. It's not like Cluster much at all but I don't like Cluster.
The water profile is the yellow bitter profile in Bru'n Water. It's not what I would normally use for a German or Czech pilsner but I wanted something a little closer to what local water is like after boiling. I want a little more sulfate and bicarbonate to give the hops a little more pop.
Pre-Prohibition Pilsner Inspired Recipe
Details | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batch Size: 1 gallon | |||||||
Est. ABV: 5.4% | |||||||
Est. IBU: 36.5 | |||||||
Est. OG: 1.051 | |||||||
Est. FG: 1.010 | |||||||
Est. SRM: 3.3 | |||||||
Expected Efficiency: 72% | |||||||
Grain Bill | Pounds | Ounces | SRM | Pct. Grist | |||
Two row pale malt | 1 | 8 | 2 | 77.70% | |||
Sweet corn | 7 | 1 | 22.30% | ||||
Water Profile | ppm | ||||||
Modified Bru'n Water Yellow Bitter | |||||||
PH: 5.33 | |||||||
Calcium | 49 | ||||||
Magnesium | 10 | ||||||
Sodium | 5 | ||||||
Sulfate | 108 | ||||||
Chloride | 45 | ||||||
Bicarbonate | -83 | ||||||
Water Additions | Mash | Sparge | |||||
Gypsum | 0.4g | 0.3g | |||||
Epsom Salt | 0.3g | 0 | 0.2g | ||||
Canning Salt | |||||||
Baking Soda | |||||||
Calcium Chloride | 0.2g | 0.1g | |||||
Chalk | |||||||
Pickling Lime | |||||||
Lactic Acid | 0.4ml | ||||||
Mash Schedule | Step Temp. | Step Time | |||||
Single decoction mash with cereal mash | |||||||
Mash volume: 3.47 qt | |||||||
Sparge volume: 0.62 gal | |||||||
Infuse 1 quart with corn and boil 30 min | 212 | 30 | |||||
Add cereal mash to 2.47 qt mash water | |||||||
Infuse mash with 3.47 qt total at 156F | 148F | 20 | |||||
Decoct 0.50 qt and boil | |||||||
Return decoction to raise mash | 156F | 40 | |||||
Boil Schedule | Volume | Unit | Time | IBU | |||
60 minute boil | |||||||
Mt. Hood [6%] | 0.25 | oz | 60 | 28.3 | |||
Mt. Hood [6%] | 0.2 | oz | 10 | 8.2 | |||
Mt. Hood [6%] | 0.1 | oz | 0 | 0 | |||
Fermentation Schedule | # Days | Temp. | |||||
Yeast: 34/70 | |||||||
Pitch half dry packet | |||||||
Pitch at 62F | 15 | 65 | |||||
Lager at 35F | 3 | 35F |
Brewday & Fermentation Notes
Brewed 2.22.18
First runnings: 1.054
Preboil gravity: 1.033
Preboil volume: 1.7 gal
Mash efficiency: 82%
Postboil gravity: 1.054
Postboil volume: 1 gal
Brewhouse efficiency: 76%
Lagered 3.10.18 to 33F for three days.
Is there much flavor or syrup texture added by the sweet corn or is it mainly for increasing the sugar/alcohol? I'm interested in making a 5% Czech pilsener variation and this looks like a good starting recipe with the 34/70 yeast and maybe 55F lagering.
ReplyDelete