I guess if I had anything unusual to say about the style it's that I hope it finds paths to stretch beyond just trying to be as murky as possible. I think paths exist using hops and other grains other than the small number that dominate the style that may breed completely new beer styles. Not just for more murk or fruit flavor. Why can't the style's smoother mouthfeel apply to darker beer styles? What would happen if a brewer lent the style's mechanics to a lower ABV pale ale with noble hops?
Today's recipe does not answer these questions. It's a basic NE style pale ale with just azacca hops. The ingredient choices fell on utility; it's just ingredients I need to use up in the house. I opted for the NE style over a drier west coast pale ale because I still want to explore understanding the water profile that makes the style work. It's a nice summer beer to brew. It will feed my free party pig as something to sip through July.
Azacca Single Hop NE Pale Ale Recipe
Details | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batch Size: 2.25 gallon | |||||||
Est. ABV: 5.1% | |||||||
Est. IBU: 41 | |||||||
Est. OG: 1.050 | |||||||
Est. FG: 1.011 | |||||||
Est. SRM: 5 | |||||||
Expected Efficiency: 72% | |||||||
Grain Bill | Pounds | Ounces | SRM | Pct. Grist | |||
Pale malt | 3 | 0 | 2 | 70.60% | |||
White wheat malt | 8 | 2 | 11.80% | ||||
Flaked oats | 8 | 1 | 11.80% | ||||
Crystal 20 | 4 | 20 | 5.90% | ||||
Water Profile | ppm | ||||||
NE IPA Profile | |||||||
PH: 5.5 | |||||||
Calcium | 100 | ||||||
Magnesium | 12 | ||||||
Sodium | 29 | ||||||
Sulfate | 67 | ||||||
Chloride | 134 | ||||||
Bicarbonate | 55 | ||||||
Water Additions | Mash | Sparge | |||||
Gypsum | 0.2g | 0.2g | |||||
Epsom Salt | 0.7g | 0 | 0.8g | ||||
Canning Salt | |||||||
Baking Soda | 0.6g | ||||||
Calcium Chloride | 1.7g | 1.8g | |||||
Chalk | 0.3g | ||||||
Pickling Lime | |||||||
Lactic Acid | 0.6ml | ||||||
Mash Schedule | Step Temp. | Step Time | |||||
Single infusion mash | |||||||
Mash volume: 6.38 qt | |||||||
Sparge volume: 1.74 gal | |||||||
Infuse 76.38 quarts at 167F | 152F | 60 | |||||
Sparge 1.74 gal at 190F | |||||||
Boil Schedule | Volume | Unit | Time | IBU | |||
60 minute boil | |||||||
Azacca [10.30%] | 0.3 | oz | FWH | 31.6 | |||
Azacca [10.30%] | 0.5 | oz | 5 | 9.5 | |||
Azacca [10.30%] | 1.2 | oz | Whirl | ? | |||
Fermentation Schedule | # Days | Temp. | |||||
Yeast: WY1318 | |||||||
Pitch 40ml yeast slurry | |||||||
Pitch at 65F | 14 | 65 | |||||
Dry hop 2 oz azacca hops | 3 | Ambient | |||||
Package in party pig |
Brewday and Fermentation Notes
Brewed 6.17.17.
First runnings: 1.080
Preboil volume: 3.4 gal
Preboil gravity: 1.038
Mash efficiency: 82%
Postboil gravity: 1.050
Postboil volume: 2.25 gal
Brewhouse efficiency: 72%
"I guess if I had anything unusual to say about the style it's that I hope it finds paths to stretch beyond just trying to be as murky as possible."
ReplyDeleteDo you really believe that? There are obviously breweries putting out poorly done IPAs and calling them NE IPA to capitalize on market interest (I see this with Gose as well). But, the haze (not murk, as that implies yeast/trub) is a by-product of the process, not the intention. I don't think anyone has figured out why, but the leading hypotheses revolve around heavy dry hopping rates (and during primary fermentation).
Anyways, tasting notes?